Access to an Effective Remedy and Reparations for Civilian Victims of Armed Drone Strikes

Authors Quirine Eijkman, Marlieke Bakker
Published in The Future of Drone Use
Publication date 2016
Type Book


Hoofdstuk 15 15.1 Introduction 15.2 An international law perspective 15.3 The American position 15.4 International human rights developments 15.5 Effective remedy and reparations 15.6 Reflections References In the international arena there are some encouraging developments in relation to accountability and transparency for the use of armed drones. It is increasingly recognized that remote pilotless aircraft have become part of modern warfare, and that sometimes they are also used outside the context of armed conflict. Subsequently, both international humanitarian and human rights law can apply. The issue of access to justice, however, receives less explicit socio-political attention. Victims of armed remote pilotless aircraft strikes meet countless challenges in effectuating their right to an effective remedy. Often even a formal recognition that a strike has taken place is lacking. Furthermore, the states involved fail to publicly release information about their own investigations. This makes it difficult for those affected to substantiate their status as a victim and seek justice, including reparations. The international community should, in addition to urging involved states to independently and impartially investigate all armed drone strikes, ensure that access to an effective remedy for civilian victims, whether on an international, transnational or national level, becomes a reality.

On this publication contributed

Language English
Published in The Future of Drone Use
Key words Armed drones, Targeted killings, Counterterrorism, Effective remedy, Reparations, Victims
Page range 289-300

Quirine Eijkman

Querine Eijkman | Researcher | Research group Access to Justice

Quirine Eijkman

  • Professor
  • Research group: Access to Justice