Clinical indicators associated with pain trajectories in non-specific neck pain: a secondary analysis of a multicentre prospective observational cohort to develop a clinical compass for personalised physiotherapy in primary care

Authors Martine Verwoerd, Sophie Konings, Henri Kiers, Rob Smeets, Richard Felius
Published in BMJ Open
Publication date 2026
Research groups Clinical Decision Making in Movement Care
Type Article

Summary

**Objectives** To identify clinical indicators reflecting potentially treatment-modifiable prognostic factors associated with pain recovery in patients with non-specific neck pain and to develop a prototype clinical compass for visualising patient-specific profiles. **Design** Secondary analysis of data from a multicentre, prospective, observational prognostic cohort study, with a 6-month follow-up between January 2020 and March 2023. **Setting** 30 physiotherapy primary care practices. **Participants** Patients with a new episode of non-specific neck pain. **Primary and secondary outcome measures** Patients completed questionnaires at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months assessing pain intensity and biological, psychological and social factors. Questionnaire total scores and individual items reflecting selected potentially modifiable factors were tested separately as candidate indicators. Baseline and repeated indicators were examined as effect modifiers of pain trajectories using growth-curve models. Subsequently, modifiable clinical indicators were incorporated as effect modifiers to evaluate their influence on the trajectory of pain intensity over time. Non-redundant significant indicators were integrated into a prototype clinical compass. **Results** Data from 603 participants were collected. A quadratic growth-curve model best explained the longitudinal change of pain intensity. 24 clinical indicators were significantly associated with the trajectory of pain intensity over time. Two characteristics were excluded as they demonstrated high intercorrelation. Based on these findings, a clinical compass comprising 22 clinical indicators was developed to visualise patient-specific profiles. **Conclusions** This study provides a prototype clinical compass that may inform prognostic reasoning in primary care physiotherapy, but further evaluation is needed before clinical implementation.

Downloads en links

On this publication contributed

  • Sophie Konings
    • PhD candidate
    • Research group: Clinical Decision Making in Movement Care
  • Henri Kiers | Researcher | Research group Clinical Decision Making in Movement Care
    Henri Kiers
    • Professor
    • Research group: Clinical Decision Making in Movement Care
  • Richard Felius Promovendus
    Richard Felius
    • Researcher
    • Research group: Clinical Decision Making in Movement Care
Language English
Published in BMJ Open
Year and volume 16 8
Key words non-specific neck pain, clinical indicators, pain recovery, physiotherapy
Digital Object Identifier 10.5281/zenodo.21511654
Page range 1-13

Clinical Decision Making in Movement Care